Tydskrif vir letterkunde

449 papers and 555 indexed citations i.

About

The 449 papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde in the last decades have received a total of 555 indexed citations. Papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde usually cover Sociology and Political Science (178 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (143 papers) and Anthropology (88 papers) specifically the topics of South African History and Culture (109 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (94 papers) and African history and culture studies (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tydskrif vir letterkunde are Van Niekerk, Hein Willemse, Vic Webb, Antjie Krog, Mark Sanders, Russell H. Kaschula, Philip St. John, Tanure Ojaide, Hermann Giliomée and Stephen Gill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde.

Countries where authors publish in Tydskrif vir letterkunde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tydskrif vir letterkunde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tydskrif vir letterkunde more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025