Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

2.1k papers and 15.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica usually cover Geophysics (971 papers), Oceanography (554 papers) and Molecular Biology (509 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (517 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (509 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica are Vit Jelínek, Milan Burša, Vlastislav Červený, Ramón Egli, František Hrouda, J. Kouba, Josef Horálek, Tomáš Fischer, Ludĕk Klimeš and Aleš Špičák.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025