Japanese Journal of Radiology

1.8k papers and 17.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (694 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (566 papers) and Surgery (564 papers) specifically the topics of Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (198 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (174 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Journal of Radiology are Shinji Naganawa, Toshiaki Taoka, Hisashi Kawai, Toshiki Nakane, Kazuo Awai, Osamu Abe, Shigeru Kiryu, Mitsuhiro Tozaki, Kazuhiro Kitajima and Akira Kunimatsu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Journal of Radiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Journal of Radiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Journal of Radiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Journal of Radiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025