SIAM Review

2.9k papers and 175.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in SIAM Review in the last decades have received a total of 175.6k indexed citations. Papers published in SIAM Review usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (651 papers), Numerical Analysis (509 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (347 papers) specifically the topics of Matrix Theory and Algorithms (288 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (171 papers) and Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in SIAM Review are Michael Newman, Herbert W. Hethcote, Tamara G. Kolda, Brett W. Bader, Per Christian Hansen, Desmond J. Higham, Benoît B. Mandelbrot, John W. Van Ness, Lloyd N. Trefethen and Stephen Boyd.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in SIAM Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in SIAM Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in SIAM Review.

Countries where authors publish in SIAM Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in SIAM Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in SIAM Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SIAM Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025