Aerosol Science and Technology

4.0k papers and 132.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 132.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology usually cover Atmospheric Science (1.5k papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.4k papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (992 papers) specifically the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1.3k papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1.3k papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (972 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aerosol Science and Technology are Peter H. McMurry, C. M. Sorensen, Tami C. Bond, Richard C. Flagan, Barbara J. Turpin, R. W. Bergstrom, Douglas R. Worsnop, Ho‐Jin Lim, Robert McGraw and Pao K. Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Aerosol Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aerosol Science and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aerosol Science and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aerosol Science and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025