Quaternary Research

3.9k papers and 178.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.9k papers published in Quaternary Research in the last decades have received a total of 178.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Quaternary Research usually cover Atmospheric Science (3.4k papers), Ecology (1.2k papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.3k papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (836 papers) and Geological formations and processes (835 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaternary Research are Stephen C. Porter, Hartmut Heinrich, Nicholas J Shackleton, André Berger, I. Colin Prentice, Neil D. Opdyke, James S. Clark, Minze Stuiver, Calvin J. Heusser and Miron L. Heinselman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quaternary Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaternary Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaternary Research.

Countries where authors publish in Quaternary Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaternary Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaternary Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaternary Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025