Decision Sciences
About
In The Last Decade
Decision Sciences
2.2k papers receiving 97.6k citations
Fields of papers published in Decision Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Decision Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Decision Sciences.
Countries where authors publish in Decision Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Decision Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Decision Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Sciences more than expected).
- Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008)
- A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test (1996)
- A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test (1996)
- An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management (1989)
- Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs (1996)
- The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities (2007)
- The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage (1995)
- Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM* (1996)
- An Exploratory Analysis of the Value of the Skills of IT Personnel: Their Relationship to IS Infrastructure and Competitive Advantage (2001)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.