Studies in French Cinema

248 papers and 371 indexed citations

About

The 248 papers published in Studies in French Cinema in the last decades have received a total of 371 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in French Cinema usually cover History (158 papers), Economics and Econometrics (120 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (56 papers) specifically the topics of French Historical and Cultural Studies (127 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (120 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in French Cinema are Will Higbee, Martine Beugnet, Mary Harrod, Mireille Rosello, Susan Hayward, Florence Martin, Sarah Cooper, Emma Wilson, Phil Powrie and Elizabeth Ezra.

In The Last Decade

Studies in French Cinema

139 papers receiving 255 citations

Fields of papers published in Studies in French Cinema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in French Cinema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in French Cinema.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in French Cinema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in French Cinema. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in French Cinema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in French Cinema more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026