Seton Hall Law Review

292 papers and 645 indexed citations i.

About

The 292 papers published in Seton Hall Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 645 indexed citations. Papers published in Seton Hall Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (99 papers), Law (95 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (66 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (56 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (26 papers) and Economic Analysis of Law and Legal Systems (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seton Hall Law Review are Tal Zarsky, D. Michael Risinger, William C. Thompson, David M. Smolin, Michael J. Saks, Richard D. Friedman, Alex John London, Kim Ēnglish, Dale A. Nance and Barbara A. Spellman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Seton Hall Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seton Hall Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seton Hall Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Seton Hall Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seton Hall Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seton Hall Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seton Hall Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025