Kim Ēnglish

741 citations
19 papers · 392 indexed · h-index 10

Kim Ēnglish

16 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Kim Ēnglish
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 270
  • Sociology and Political Science 269
  • Gender Studies 40
  • Social Psychology 42
  • Health 16
Replace Steffanie Sperry with:
Steffanie Sperry United States
Daniel T. Wilcox United Kingdom
Farnaz Farnam Iran
Richard A. Carroll United States
Paige M. Harrison United States
Cara R. Dunkley Canada
Jane S. T. Woo Canada
Constance Avery‐Clark United States
Lawrence R. Ricci United States
C. Wijsen Netherlands
Kim Ēnglish relative to Steffanie Sperry United States Steffanie Sperry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Steffanie Sperry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Ēnglish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Ēnglish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Ēnglish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Ēnglish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Ēnglish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Ēnglish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Ēnglish. The network helps show where Kim Ēnglish may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kim Ēnglish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Ēnglish Line = papers co-authored together Kim Ēnglish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2
Vaccine Practice for Health Professionals: 1st Canadian Edition
20200
3 20201
4 201358
5 200917
6
Community Corrections in Colorado: A Study of Program Outcomes and Recidivism, FY00-FY04
20063
7
The Containment Approach to Managing Sex Offenders
200413
8
Community geography : GIS in action
200313
9 200337
10
EVALUATION OF COLORADO'S PRISON THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY FOR SEX OFFENDERS:
20031
11
Sexual offender containment: use of the postconviction polygraph.
200340
12 20026
13 200095
14
20003
15 199862
16 19981
17
The Human Rights Handbook
19971
18 199331
19 19919

About Kim Ēnglish

Kim Ēnglish is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (270 citations), Sociology and Political Science (269 citations) and Gender Studies (40 citations). Kim Ēnglish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peggy Heil, Linda Jones, Mikel Gray, Samantha Mayo, Linda Harrison, Paul D. Retzlaff, Oona St-Amant, Vinita Dubey, Jennifer Lapum and Kate Leslie. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Criminal Justice and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026