Countries where authors publish in Visual Communication Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Communication Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Communication Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly.
About Visual Communication Quarterly
The 359 papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (62 papers), Communication (89 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (63 papers), Philosophy (49 papers) and History (42 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (74 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (49 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (48 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (34 papers), Media Influence and Health (27 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (22 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (20 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Communication Quarterly are James Floyd Kelly, Shahira Fahmy, Hyunjin Seo, Sheree Josephson, Nicole Smith Dahmen, Mary Angela Bock, Kimberly Bissell, Wayne Wanta, Wilson Lowrey and Nicole H. O’Donnell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.