Jean Porter
- Philosophy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. PopeJoshua MitchellJames F. KeenanMargaret Urban WalkerRobin W. LovinLisa TessmanNicholas WolterstorffMark A. Wilson
- Topics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology (16 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (10 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaHuman Gene TherapyJournal of Law and Religion
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jean Porter
36 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 83
- Political Science and International Relations 57
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- History 23
- Religious studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Jean Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean Porter. The network helps show where Jean Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean Porter. Jean Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Moral Virtues, Charity, and Grace: Why the Infused and Acquired Virtues Cannot Co-Exist | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Desire for Happiness and the Virtues of the Will | 1 |
| 5 | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Natural and Divine Law: Reclaiming the Tradition for Christian Ethics | 28 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Contested Categories: Reason, Nature, and Natural Order in Medieval Accounts of the Natural Law | 1 |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Jean Porter
Jean Porter is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (16 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (10 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (83 citations), Religious studies (21 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (57 citations). Jean Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Pope, Joshua Mitchell, James F. Keenan, Margaret Urban Walker, Robin W. Lovin, Lisa Tessman, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Mark A. Wilson, Fred Dallmayr and Jonathan Chaplin. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Human Gene Therapy and Journal of Law and Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.