David F. Ford
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Ecology
- Religious studies top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Neil B. FordLance R. WilliamsKevin B. MayesCharles R. RandklevSteve WolvertonJanet Martin SoskiceJames H. KennedyAstrid N. Schwalb
- Topics
- Christian Theology and Mission (17 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers)Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied and Environmental MicrobiologyHydrobiologia
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
David F. Ford
44 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 147
- Ecology 115
- Religious studies 110
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 95
- Philosophy 71
Countries citing papers authored by David F. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Ford. The network helps show where David F. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Ford. David F. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | Interreligious reading after Vatican II: scriptural reasoning, comparative theology and receptive ecumenism | 2 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Faith and Universities in a Religious and Secular World (1) | 0 |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | Fields of Faith: MEETINGS ON MUTUAL GROUND | 2 |
| 15 | Reading Texts, Seeking Wisdom: Scripture and Theology | 3 |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | The Shape of Living: Spiritual Directions for Everyday Life | 5 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About David F. Ford
David F. Ford is a scholar working on Religious studies, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Philosophy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Christian Theology and Mission (17 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (110 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (95 citations) and Philosophy (71 citations). David F. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil B. Ford, Lance R. Williams, Kevin B. Mayes, Charles R. Randklev, Steve Wolverton, Janet Martin Soskice, James H. Kennedy, Astrid N. Schwalb, Ben Quash and Alexander Y. Karatayev. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Hydrobiologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.