David F. Ford

155 total papers · 1.2k total citations
55 papers, 374 citations indexed

About

David F. Ford is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, David F. Ford has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 374 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Religious studies, 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in David F. Ford's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (17 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers). David F. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (17 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers). David F. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. David F. Ford's co-authors include Neil B. Ford, Lance R. Williams, Steve Wolverton, Astrid N. Schwalb, Charles R. Randklev, Janet Martin Soskice, Kevin B. Mayes, Oliver Davies, James H. Kennedy and Ben Quash and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Hydrobiologia.

In The Last Decade

David F. Ford

44 papers receiving 303 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
David F. Ford 147 115 110 95 71 55 374
Kathryn Tanner 220 1.5× 27 0.2× 142 1.3× 11 0.1× 96 1.4× 41 382
Christopher Key Chapple 181 1.2× 20 0.2× 76 0.7× 53 0.6× 94 1.3× 62 379
Jeppe Sinding Jensen 204 1.4× 21 0.2× 29 0.3× 66 0.7× 116 1.6× 41 362
Jane Mulcock 143 1.0× 58 0.5× 6 0.1× 41 0.4× 16 0.2× 20 377
Christopher Vecsey 123 0.8× 28 0.2× 17 0.2× 41 0.4× 30 0.4× 40 415
Andrew Linzey 127 0.9× 28 0.2× 31 0.3× 39 0.4× 87 1.2× 42 337
James Murphy 113 0.8× 40 0.3× 7 0.1× 12 0.1× 21 0.3× 34 443
Robert A. Pierce 68 0.5× 57 0.5× 10 0.1× 37 0.4× 9 0.1× 66 362
Catherine Keller 200 1.4× 10 0.1× 74 0.7× 17 0.2× 84 1.2× 37 345
Paul Sullivan 63 0.4× 62 0.5× 6 0.1× 55 0.6× 3 0.0× 33 393

Countries citing papers authored by David F. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Ford. The network helps show where David F. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Ford. David F. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026