Imago Mundi

870 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 870 papers published in Imago Mundi in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Imago Mundi usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (385 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (166 papers) and Archeology (114 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Geography and Cartography (346 papers), History of Science and Medicine (134 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Imago Mundi are J. B. Harley, David Woodward, Denis Cosgrove, Matthew H. Edney, Sumathi Ramaswamy, David Turnbull, Catherine Delano Smith, Arthur H. Robinson, James R. Akerman and Charles Withers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Imago Mundi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Imago Mundi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Imago Mundi.

Countries where authors publish in Imago Mundi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Imago Mundi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Imago Mundi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imago Mundi more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025