South Asian Review

432 papers and 487 indexed citations i.

About

The 432 papers published in South Asian Review in the last decades have received a total of 487 indexed citations. Papers published in South Asian Review usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (161 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (147 papers) and Philosophy (129 papers) specifically the topics of South Asian Cinema and Culture (144 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (100 papers) and South Asian Studies and Diaspora (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in South Asian Review are Radhika Gajjala, Elizabeth Sauer, Pramod K. Nayar, Amardeep Singh, Makarand Paranjape, Roopika Risam, James W. Gair, Rohit K. Dasgupta, Ahmed Gamal and Meenakshi Sharma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in South Asian Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in South Asian Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in South Asian Review.

Countries where authors publish in South Asian Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in South Asian Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in South Asian Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites South Asian Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025