Revus
- Law top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Fields
- Law (169 papers)Political Science and International Relations (142 papers)Industrial relations (3 papers)
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional StudiesLaw in Society and CultureFree Will and Agency
In The Last Decade
Revus
192 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Law 340
- Political Science and International Relations 273
- Philosophy 86
- Sociology and Political Science 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 61
Countries where authors publish in Revus
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revus more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Revus
This network shows the impact of papers published in Revus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revus.
About Revus
The 300 papers published in Revus in the last decades have received a total of 518 indexed citations . Papers published in Revus usually cover Law (169 papers), Political Science and International Relations (142 papers) and Industrial relations (3 papers) specifically the topics of Judicial and Constitutional Studies (68 papers), Law in Society and Culture (50 papers) and Free Will and Agency (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revus are Riccardo Guastini, Brian H. Bix, Kenneth Einar Himma, Stanley L. Paulson, Robert Alexy, Bartosz Brożek, Roberto Gargarella, Gregory C. Keating, Luigi Ferrajoli and Frank Jackson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.