Reviews in Mathematical Physics

1.2k papers and 19.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics in the last decades have received a total of 19.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics usually cover Mathematical Physics (656 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (510 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (367 papers) specifically the topics of Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (297 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (215 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews in Mathematical Physics are Mary Beth Ruskai, Stefan Hollands, Pavel Exner, Kanehisa Takasaki, Roberto Longo, Donato Fortunato, Vieri Benci, Dėnes Petz, Takashi Takebe and Michael Aizenman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews in Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews in Mathematical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews in Mathematical Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025