Replace Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering with:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and EngineeringChina
Open ChemistryPoland
Sustainable Chemistry and PharmacyChina
Journal of Saudi Chemical SocietySaudi Arabia
Communications ChemistryUnited States
Brazilian Journal of Chemical EngineeringBrazil
Cell Reports Physical ScienceChina
Environmental Progress & Sustainable EnergyChina
Adsorption Science & TechnologyChina
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and TechnologyChina
Frontiers of Chemical Science and EngineeringChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering · 1×
×0.55.5kBE
×0.97.3kMC
×0.31.9kOC
×0.72.4kCATAL
×1.44.4kME
Citations per year, relative to Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reaction Chemistry & Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers published in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.