Thomas M. Hout

13 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Competing Against Time9081990202620022014250500750

Peers

Thomas M. Hout
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Management Information Systems 528
  • Strategy and Management 846
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 332
  • Management Science and Operations Research 291
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 160
Replace Wickham Skinner with:
Wickham Skinner United States
Jeffrey G. Miller United States
Gouher Ahmed United Arab Emirates
Michael Tracey United States
Thomas F. Burgess United Kingdom
Maling Ebrahimpour United States
Roland Van Dierdonck Belgium
Krisztina Demeter Hungary
Bart Vos Netherlands
Stefano Tonchia Italy
Thomas M. Hout relative to Wickham Skinner United States Wickham Skinner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Wickham Skinner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Hout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Hout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Hout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Hout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Hout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Hout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Hout. The network helps show where Thomas M. Hout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Hout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Hout Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Hout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2
Pueden las empresas chinas conquistar el mundo
20171
3
Can China’s companies conquer the world?
20163
4
A chinese approach to management.
201432
5
Gigantes globales del mañana: no sólo los sospechosos de siempre
20084
6 20050
7 19965
8 19923
9
The fallacy of the overhead quick fix.
199148
10 199024
11
Competing Against Timebreakdown →
1990908
12 199010
13
Hoy, lo importante es la gestión del tiempo de los procesos de la empresa
19890
14
Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power
1988238
15 1982260
16 19784

About Thomas M. Hout

Thomas M. Hout is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (1 paper), Organizational Management and Innovation (1 paper), International Business and FDI (1 paper), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (528 citations), Strategy and Management (846 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (332 citations). Thomas M. Hout has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include George Stalk, Joseph L. Bower, Michael E. Porter, Joseph P. Michael, Pankaj Ghemawat, James C. Abegglen, Xiaohong Wu and Michael J. Enright. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Harvard business review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026