Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using thematic analysis in psychology
2006113.3k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeQualitative Research in Psychologyprofile →
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
20198.9k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeQualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Healthprofile →
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
20204.4k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeQualitative Research in Psychologyprofile →
Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide
20222.8k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarkeprofile →
Thematic analysis
20162.4k citationsVictoria Clarke, Virginia Braunprofile →
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
20192.4k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeQualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Healthprofile →
Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis.
20211.9k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarkeprofile →
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches
20201.6k citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeCounselling and Psychotherapy Researchprofile →
Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning
20131.2k citationsVictoria Clarke, Virginia Braunprofile →
The online survey as a qualitative research tool
2020872 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarke et al.profile →
Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research
2016636 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarke et al.profile →
Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection
2018443 citationsVictoria Clarke, Virginia BraunCounselling and Psychotherapy Researchprofile →
(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis
2016344 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarkeprofile →
‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis
2019318 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarke et al.Qualitative Research in Psychologyprofile →
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting
2023249 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarkeprofile →
Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine : A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG)
2024199 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria Clarkeprofile →
A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International
202469 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeHealth Promotion Internationalprofile →
Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach
202465 citationsVirginia Braun, Victoria ClarkeQualitative Research in Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Clarke
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Clarke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Clarke. The network helps show where Victoria Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Clarke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Clarke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Clarke. Victoria Clarke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2024). A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promotion International. 39(3).69 indexed citations breakdown →
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2024). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 22(2). 399–438.65 indexed citations breakdown →
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 18(3). 328–352.4409 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 21(1). 37–47.1555 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Braun, Virginia, et al.. (2019). Being both narrative practitioner and academic researcher: A reflection on what thematic analysis has to offer narratively informed research. ResearchSpace (University of Auckland). 2019(4). 86.15 indexed citations
9.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health. 13(2). 201–216.2402 indexed citations breakdown →
Clarke, Victoria. (2010). Review of the book "Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research". Psychology Learning & Teaching. 9(1).14 indexed citations
12.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2009). Special Issue: Coming out in higher education. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).1 indexed citations
13.
Clarke, Victoria & Virginia Braun. (2009). Is the personal pedagogical? Sexualities and genders in the higher education classroom. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).2 indexed citations
14.
Clarke, Victoria. (2007). Slippery slopes and the queer parenting Armageddon: normalising and radical responses to arguments about the importance of maternal and paternal influences in childrearing. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol). 8(1).2 indexed citations
15.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2). 77–101.113295 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Clarke, Victoria, et al.. (2006). Challenging preconceptions about lesbian parenting: Victoria Clarke in conversation with Lisa Saffron. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol). 7(1).1 indexed citations
17.
Clarke, Victoria, Carole B. Burgoyne, & Maree Burns. (2005). For love or money? Comparing lesbian and gay, and heterosexual relationships. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).5 indexed citations
Clarke, Victoria. (2003). The Case for a World Environment Organization. 3.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.