The Lancet Healthy Longevity

360 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 360 papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 papers), Physiology (69 papers) and General Health Professions (66 papers) specifically the topics of Frailty in Older Adults (76 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (53 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Lancet Healthy Longevity are Andrew Scott, Manlio Vinciguerra, Marco Raffaele, Gustavo Duque, John E. Morley, Míkel Izquierdo, Andrea B. Maier, Carol Brayne, Hans Wildiers and Phillip Parente.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity.

Countries where authors publish in The Lancet Healthy Longevity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Lancet Healthy Longevity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025