Paul Stenner

7.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
101 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

Paul Stenner is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Stenner has authored 101 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 16 papers in Social Psychology and 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Paul Stenner's work include Q Methodology Applications (26 papers), Social Representations and Identity (7 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 papers). Paul Stenner is often cited by papers focused on Q Methodology Applications (26 papers), Social Representations and Identity (7 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 papers). Paul Stenner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Hong Kong. Paul Stenner's co-authors include Simon Watts, Steven Brown, A. Bowling, Monica Greco, Tara McFarquhar, Ann Bowling, Suzanne M. Skevington, Deborah Cooper, Christine P. Dancey and Peter Lunt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Paul Stenner

95 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Doing Q ethodology: theor... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2012 2012 250 500 750

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Paul Stenner 1.4k 1.0k 632 562 344 101 4.1k
Steven R. Brown 1.8k 1.3× 807 0.8× 421 0.7× 228 0.4× 172 0.5× 81 3.7k
Hilary Bradbury 603 0.4× 1.5k 1.4× 320 0.5× 1.1k 2.0× 328 1.0× 40 5.1k
Pat Bazeley 317 0.2× 1.0k 1.0× 334 0.5× 883 1.6× 462 1.3× 39 4.2k
Donna M. Mertens 981 0.7× 1.4k 1.4× 472 0.7× 1.2k 2.2× 580 1.7× 108 5.7k
George I. Balch 776 0.6× 451 0.4× 163 0.3× 262 0.5× 129 0.4× 23 2.2k
Martyn Denscombe 260 0.2× 1.2k 1.1× 353 0.6× 559 1.0× 267 0.8× 46 4.4k
Lisa A. Turner 305 0.2× 895 0.9× 459 0.7× 789 1.4× 513 1.5× 43 4.4k
David S. Cordray 529 0.4× 917 0.9× 639 1.0× 773 1.4× 713 2.1× 75 5.1k
Kathleen M. T. Collins 349 0.3× 668 0.6× 392 0.6× 776 1.4× 339 1.0× 65 3.4k
Michael Agar 241 0.2× 2.4k 2.3× 436 0.7× 1.0k 1.8× 431 1.3× 120 7.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stenner. The network helps show where Paul Stenner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Stenner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Stenner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Stenner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Stenner. Paul Stenner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm, Giacomo Carli, Paul Stenner, & Maria Rita Tagliaventi. (2025). A Pandemic of Possibilities: The Spread of Potentiality-Seeking Organisations under Conditions of the COVID-19 Lockdown. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 3(2). 187–210. 1 indexed citations
3.
Stenner, Paul. (2025). Crisis and Sensemaking: The Relevance of Liminal Experience and Metastability for a Sociocultural Psychology of Crisis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 59(4). 70–70.
4.
Stenner, Paul & Raffaele De Luca Picione. (2023). A Theoretically Informed Critical Review of Research Applying the Concept of Liminality to Understand Experiences with Cancer: Implications for a New Oncological Agenda in Health Psychology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(11). 5982–5982. 10 indexed citations
5.
Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm & Paul Stenner. (2023). How the Welfare State Tries to Protect Itself Against the law: Luhmann and new Forms of Social Immune Mechanism. Law and Critique. 35(2). 257–279. 1 indexed citations
6.
Keysar, Ariela, et al.. (2022). The Diversity Of Worldviews Among Young Adults. Åbo Akademi University Research Portal. 5 indexed citations
7.
Beckwith, Helen, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Mark H. Freeston, et al.. (2022). A “transmission gap” between research and practice? A Q-methodology study of perceptions of the application of attachment theory among clinicians working with children and among attachment researchers. Attachment & Human Development. 24(6). 661–689. 3 indexed citations
8.
Greco, Monica & Paul Stenner. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory & Psychology. 27(2). 147–166. 59 indexed citations
9.
Stenner, Paul & Monica Greco. (2013). Affectivity. Informática na educação teoria & prática. 16(1). 1 indexed citations
10.
Stenner, Paul. (2011). James and Whitehead. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. III(1). 8 indexed citations
11.
Apfelbacher, Christian, Matthew Hankins, Paul Stenner, Anthony J. Frew, & Helen Smith. (2010). Measuring asthma‐specific quality of life: structured review. Allergy. 66(4). 439–457. 36 indexed citations
12.
Farrimond, Hannah, Hélène Joffé, & Paul Stenner. (2010). A Q-methodological study of smoking identities. Psychology and Health. 25(8). 979–998. 17 indexed citations
13.
Stenner, Paul. (2005). An outline of an autopoietic systems approach to emotion. Open Research Online (The Open University). 12. 8–22. 12 indexed citations
14.
Watts, Simon & Paul Stenner. (2005). The subjective experience of partnership love: A Q Methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology. 44(1). 85–107. 63 indexed citations
15.
Stenner, Paul. (2004). Psychology and the Political: On the psychology of natural right and the political origins of modern psychology. UCL Discovery (University College London). 6 indexed citations
16.
Stenner, Paul. (2003). Dostoevsky and the Spirit of Critical Psychology.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
17.
Stenner, Paul & Simon Watts. (2003). Q methodology, quantum theory and subjectivity. Operant Subjectivity. 26(4). 155–173. 2 indexed citations
18.
Stenner, Paul, Deborah Cooper, & Suzanne M. Skevington. (2003). Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. Social Science & Medicine. 57(11). 2161–2172. 101 indexed citations
19.
Stenner, Paul, Christine P. Dancey, & Simon Watts. (2000). The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: a Q methodological study. Social Science & Medicine. 51(3). 439–452. 99 indexed citations
20.
Stenner, Paul. (1999). Sincerity, authenticity and aspirational models. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026