Psychological Inquiry

1.4k papers and 79.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Psychological Inquiry in the last decades have received a total of 79.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Inquiry usually cover Social Psychology (671 papers), Sociology and Political Science (502 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (381 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (273 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (244 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (138 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Inquiry are Richard M. Ryan, Edward L. Deci, James J. Gross, C. R. Snyder, Richard G. Tedeschi, Lawrence G. Calhoun, Michael H. Kernis, Roy F. Baumeister, Phillip R. Shaver and Richard S. Lazarus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Inquiry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Inquiry.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Inquiry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Inquiry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025