Philosophy Today

1.5k papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Philosophy Today in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy Today usually cover Philosophy (602 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (252 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (251 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (285 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (230 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy Today are Paul Ricœur, Ted Toadvine, Emmanuel Lévinas, Eugen Fink, Vladimir J. Konečni, Daniel Smith, John D. Caputo, Richard L. Lanigan, Michael Marder and Linda Martín Alcoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy Today

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy Today. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy Today.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy Today

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy Today. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy Today with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy Today more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025