Philosophy & Social Criticism

1.6k papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism usually cover Sociology and Political Science (856 papers), Political Science and International Relations (654 papers) and Philosophy (496 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (318 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (318 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (172 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy & Social Criticism are Antje Gimmler, Helmut Becker, Raúl Fornet-Betancourt, Alfredo Gómez-Müller, Jean-Claude Gauthier, Charles Taylor, Paul Ricœur, William E. Scheuerman, Jürgen Habermas and Alia Al‐Saji.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy & Social Criticism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy & Social Criticism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy & Social Criticism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy & Social Criticism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025