Continental Philosophy Review

578 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 578 papers published in Continental Philosophy Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Continental Philosophy Review usually cover Philosophy (331 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (215 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (142 papers) specifically the topics of Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (207 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (201 papers) and Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Continental Philosophy Review are Dan Zahavi, Maxine Sheets‐Johnstone, Alia Al‐Saji, Todd May, Joel Krueger, Graham Harman, Anthony J. Steinbock, Fredrik Svenaeus, Johanna Oksala and Gail Weiss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Continental Philosophy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Continental Philosophy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Continental Philosophy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Continental Philosophy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Continental Philosophy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Continental Philosophy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Continental Philosophy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025