Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

538 papers and 12.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 538 papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics usually cover Molecular Biology (488 papers), Cancer Research (74 papers) and Immunology (59 papers) specifically the topics of RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (322 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (245 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics are Fritz Eckstein, Annemieke Aartsma‐Rus, Stanley T. Crooke, Arthur Μ. Krieg, Steven F. Dowdy, Aaron D. Springer, David R. Corey, Pieter R. Cullis, Roy van der Meel and Jayesh A. Kulkarni.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics.

Countries where authors publish in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nucleic Acid Therapeutics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025