Current Protocols in Cell Biology

512 papers and 16.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 512 papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology in the last decades have received a total of 16.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (345 papers), Cell Biology (149 papers) and Biophysics (62 papers) specifically the topics of Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (56 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (53 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Cell Biology are Aled Clayton, Graça Raposo, Sèbastian Amigorena, Clotilde Théry, Justin R. Tse, Adam J. Engler, John M. Graham, Robert P. Mecham, Erik L. Snapp and Jennifer Lippincott‐Schwartz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Cell Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Cell Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Cell Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025