Biological Procedures Online

442 papers and 13.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 442 papers published in Biological Procedures Online in the last decades have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological Procedures Online usually cover Molecular Biology (263 papers), Oncology (58 papers) and Cancer Research (54 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (29 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (29 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Procedures Online are Harold Erickson, Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz, Muddassar Hussain, Faisal Mohd-Yasin, Michael Fenech, Nathan J. O’Callaghan, Jeanine S. Morey, Frances M. Van Dolah, James C. Ryan and Melanie D. Ohi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biological Procedures Online

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Procedures Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Procedures Online.

Countries where authors publish in Biological Procedures Online

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Procedures Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Procedures Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Procedures Online more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025