Advances in clinical chemistry

739 papers and 22.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 739 papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 22.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (264 papers), Physiology (101 papers) and Cancer Research (89 papers) specifically the topics of Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (37 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (31 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in clinical chemistry are Theresa L. Whiteside, Jiří Bajgar, Anders Grubb, Grzegorz Bartosz, W. G. Zijlstra, Erik-Jan Van Kampen, Sidney B. Rosalki, Robert C. Baxter, Carita Eklund and Theodore Peters.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in clinical chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in clinical chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in clinical chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in clinical chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025