Neuroscience Bulletin

1.7k papers and 30.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (599 papers), Molecular Biology (497 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (434 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (296 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (163 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuroscience Bulletin are Chunjiu Zhong, Zhichun Chen, Ru‐Rong Ji, Adam J. Guastella, Anne Masi, Nick Glozier, Weidong Le, Yong‐Jing Gao, Marilena M. DeMayo and Cheng He.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Neuroscience Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuroscience Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuroscience Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuroscience Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025