Medieval Archaeology

588 papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 588 papers published in Medieval Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Medieval Archaeology usually cover History (238 papers), Archeology (199 papers) and Paleontology (165 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (165 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (156 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medieval Archaeology are John G. Hurst, Neil Price, Roberta Gilchrist, Howard Williams, Finbar McCormick, Mary Lewis, Helena Hamerow, Eileen Murphy, David M. Wilson and Charles Thomas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medieval Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medieval Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medieval Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Medieval Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medieval Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medieval Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medieval Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025