Sarah Parcak

814 total citations
17 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Sarah Parcak is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Archeology and Paleontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Parcak has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Space and Planetary Science, 12 papers in Archeology and 1 paper in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Parcak's work include Archaeological Research and Protection (12 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (9 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (9 papers). Sarah Parcak is often cited by papers focused on Archaeological Research and Protection (12 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (9 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (9 papers). Sarah Parcak collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Sarah Parcak's co-authors include Eric H. Cline, Simon Keay, Kristian Strutt, Richard Granger, Nathan D. Burkett‐Cadena, Laura K. Estep, Jeffrey C. Luvall, Robert J. Novak, Eddie W. Cupp and Benjamin G. Jacob and has published in prestigious journals such as Remote Sensing, Journal of Archaeological Science and International Journal of Health Geographics.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Parcak

16 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Sarah Parcak
Robert Bewley United Kingdom
Dylan S. Davis United States
Gino Caspari Switzerland
Kate Welham United Kingdom
Rachel Opitz United Kingdom
Douglas C. Comer United States
Thomas G. Garrison United States
Sarah Parcak
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Parcak Sarah Parcak (= 1×) peers Arnau Garcia‐Molsosa

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Parcak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Parcak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Parcak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Parcak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Parcak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Parcak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Parcak. The network helps show where Sarah Parcak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Parcak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Parcak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Parcak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Parcak. Sarah Parcak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Gunter, Jennifer & Sarah Parcak. (2018). Vaginal Jade Eggs: Ancient Chinese Practice or Modern Marketing Myth?. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 25(1). 1–2. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Parcak, Sarah. (2017). Threats to the archaeological sites of Egypt: a response to Fradley and Sheldrick. Antiquity. 91(357). 793–795. 2 indexed citations
4.
Parcak, Sarah, et al.. (2017). Algorithmic Identification of Looted Archaeological Sites from Space. 4. 18 indexed citations
5.
Parcak, Sarah. (2017). Moving from Space-Based to Ground-Based Solutions in Remote Sensing for Archaeological Heritage: A Case Study from Egypt. Remote Sensing. 9(12). 1297–1297. 11 indexed citations
6.
Parcak, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Satellite evidence of archaeological site looting in Egypt: 2002–2013. Antiquity. 90(349). 188–205. 68 indexed citations
7.
Parcak, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Hiding in Plain Sight: The Discovery of a New Monumental Structure at Petra, Jordan, Using WorldView-1 and WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 375. 35–51. 11 indexed citations
8.
Parcak, Sarah. (2016). Satellite Remote Sensing for Archeaology. 1 indexed citations
9.
Parcak, Sarah. (2015). Archaeological Looting in Egypt: A Geospatial View (Case Studies from Saqqara, Lisht, and el Hibeh). Near Eastern Archaeology. 78(3). 196–203. 30 indexed citations
10.
Keay, Simon, Sarah Parcak, & Kristian Strutt. (2014). High resolution space and ground-based remote sensing and implications for landscape archaeology: the case from Portus, Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science. 52. 277–292. 39 indexed citations
12.
Jacob, Benjamin G., Nathan D. Burkett‐Cadena, Jeffrey C. Luvall, et al.. (2010). Developing GIS-based eastern equine encephalitis vector-host models in Tuskegee, Alabama. International Journal of Health Geographics. 9(1). 12–12. 18 indexed citations
13.
Parcak, Sarah. (2009). Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology. 246 indexed citations
14.
Parcak, Sarah. (2007). Satellite Remote Sensing Methods for Monitoring Archaeological Tells in the Middle East. Journal of Field Archaeology. 32(1). 65–81. 54 indexed citations
15.
Parcak, Sarah. (2003). New methods for archaeological site detection in Egypt satellite imagery analysis : case studies from Sinai and the Delta / Sarah H. Parcak.. 41. 1 indexed citations
16.
Parcak, Sarah, et al.. (2003). Pharaonic Ventures into South Sinai: El-Markha Plain Site 346. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 89(1). 83–116. 3 indexed citations
17.
Parcak, Sarah, et al.. (2002). Satellite image analysis and archaeological fieldwork in El-Markha Plain (South Sinai). Antiquity. 76(294). 953–954. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026