Countries where authors publish in médecine/sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in médecine/sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in médecine/sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites médecine/sciences more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in médecine/sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in médecine/sciences.
About médecine/sciences
The 5.4k papers published in médecine/sciences in the last decades have received a total of 21.0k indexed citations . Papers published in médecine/sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (906 papers), Aging (19 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (36 papers), Immunology (223 papers) and Cell Biology (142 papers) specifically the topics of Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (67 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (57 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (52 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (51 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (40 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (40 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (40 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in médecine/sciences are Jean‐Louis Bessereau, Christelle Gally, Bertrand Jordan, Sylvie G. Consoli, Anne Fagot-Largeault, Dominique Labie, André‐Patrick Arrigo, Robert Barouki, S Gilgenkrantz and Axel Kahn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.