Countries where authors publish in Biochemical Genetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biochemical Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biochemical Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biochemical Genetics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biochemical Genetics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biochemical Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biochemical Genetics.
About Biochemical Genetics
The 4.4k papers published in Biochemical Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 62.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biochemical Genetics usually cover Cancer Research (565 papers), Genetics (966 papers), Molecular Biology (2.3k papers), Clinical Biochemistry (141 papers) and Insect Science (235 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (363 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (267 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (247 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (206 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (180 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (150 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (148 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biochemical Genetics are Charles R. Shaw, Rupi Prasad, John G. Scandalios, Frank H. Ruddle, Walter M. Fitch, Edwin A. Azen, Roger S. Holmes, F. M. Johnson, Verne M. Chapman and John J. Hutton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.