Countries where authors publish in Genetics Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Genetics Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Genetics Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetics Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Genetics Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Genetics Research.
About Genetics Research
The 2.9k papers published in Genetics Research in the last decades have received a total of 100.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Genetics Research usually cover Genetics (1.1k papers), Plant Science (313 papers), Molecular Biology (345 papers), Developmental Biology (9 papers) and Cancer Research (35 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (294 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (269 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (226 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (187 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (180 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (114 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (103 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Genetics Research are Brian Charlesworth, William George Hill, John Maynard Smith, John Haigh, Richard Frankham, Alan Robertson, Nick Barton, Russell Lande, Deborah Charlesworth and Montgomery Slatkin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.