Norwegian Archaeological Review

614 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 614 papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review usually cover Paleontology (253 papers), History (179 papers) and Archeology (172 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (253 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (166 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Norwegian Archaeological Review are Bjørnar Olsen, Knut Helskog, Christopher Witmore, Alfredo González‐Ruibal, Gavin Lucas, Lynn Meskell, Tim Ingold, Patrick Vinton Kirch, Timothy Webmoor and Peter Rowley‐Conwy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Norwegian Archaeological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Norwegian Archaeological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Norwegian Archaeological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norwegian Archaeological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025