Dumbarton Oaks Papers

745 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 745 papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers usually cover Classics (434 papers), Archeology (387 papers) and History (272 papers) specifically the topics of Byzantine Studies and History (420 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (226 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dumbarton Oaks Papers are Cyril Mango, Clive Foss, Ernst Kitzinger, Ihor Ševčenko, Alice‐Mary Talbot, Henry Maguire, Nicolas Oikonomidès, John L. Teall, Alexander Kazhdan and Kurt Weitzmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers.

Countries where authors publish in Dumbarton Oaks Papers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dumbarton Oaks Papers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dumbarton Oaks Papers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025