Countries where authors publish in Journal of Lesbian Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Lesbian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Lesbian Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies.
About Journal of Lesbian Studies
The 797 papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Lesbian Studies usually cover Gender Studies (213 papers), Social Psychology (354 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (40 papers), Reproductive Medicine (71 papers) and Cultural Studies (66 papers) specifically the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (341 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (82 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (77 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (71 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (67 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (66 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (54 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Lesbian Studies are Beverly Greene, Kimberly F. Balsam, Asifa Siraj, Anthony R. D’Augelli, Lisa Bowleg, Kelly D. Brooks, Riia Luhtanen, Gust A. Yep, Melissa St. Pierre and Gill Valentine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.