Journal of Bisexuality

610 papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 610 papers published in Journal of Bisexuality in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Bisexuality usually cover Social Psychology (417 papers), Sociology and Political Science (279 papers) and Clinical Psychology (191 papers) specifically the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (412 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (176 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Bisexuality are Kirsten McLean, M. Paz Galupo, Michèle J. Eliason, Tania Israel, Jonathan J. Mohr, April Scarlette Callis, Lester W. Wright, Patrick S. Mulick, Paula C. Rust and Wendy Bostwick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Bisexuality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Bisexuality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Bisexuality.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Bisexuality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Bisexuality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Bisexuality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Bisexuality more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025