Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Brulex. Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé
1990517 citationsPhilippe Mousty, Monique Radeau et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Monique Radeau
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Monique Radeau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monique Radeau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monique Radeau more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monique Radeau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monique Radeau. The network helps show where Monique Radeau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monique Radeau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monique Radeau.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monique Radeau based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Monique Radeau. Monique Radeau is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Radeau, Monique & Cécile Colin. (2001). Object identity is not a condition but a result of intersensory integration: the case of audiovisual interactions. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 20(5). 349–358.1 indexed citations
7.
Radeau, Monique, et al.. (2001). Etude comportementale et électrophysiologique des processus impliqués dans l'effet Mcgurk et dans l'effet de ventriloquie. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).2 indexed citations
Colin, Cécile, et al.. (1998). Intermodal interactions in speech: a French study. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 55–60.6 indexed citations
Radeau, Monique. (1994). Ventriloquism against audio-visual speech: or, where Japanese-speaking barn owls might help. PubMed. 13(1). 124–40.7 indexed citations
15.
Iscoa, Jesús Alegría, Daniel Holender, José Morais, & Monique Radeau. (1992). Analytic approaches to human cognition. Elsevier eBooks.305 indexed citations
16.
Mousty, Philippe, et al.. (1992). The time course of braille word recognition.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 18(2). 284–297.14 indexed citations
17.
Morais, José, Philippe Mousty, Jesús Alegría Iscoa, Daniel Holender, & Monique Radeau. (1992). The causes of phonemic awareness. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 193–212.8 indexed citations
Radeau, Monique & Paul Bertelson. (1974). The After-Effects of Ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 26(1). 63–71.122 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.