Countries where authors publish in Linguistic Inquiry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Linguistic Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Linguistic Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistic Inquiry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Linguistic Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Linguistic Inquiry.
About Linguistic Inquiry
The 1.3k papers published in Linguistic Inquiry in the last decades have received a total of 52.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Linguistic Inquiry usually cover Language and Linguistics (976 papers), Linguistics and Language (296 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (359 papers), Philosophy (190 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (535 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (879 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (443 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (263 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (249 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (202 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (183 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (84 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Linguistic Inquiry are John J. McCarthy, Bruce Hayes, Željko Bošković, Noam Chomsky, C.‐T. James Huang, David Embick, Guglielmo Cinque, Norbert Hornstein, Howard Lasnik and Danny Fox.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.