Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Robin Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin Cooper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin Cooper. The network helps show where Robin Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robin Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robin Cooper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robin Cooper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robin Cooper. Robin Cooper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fernández, Raquel, Staffan Larsson, Robin Cooper, Jonathan Ginzburg, & David Schlangen. (2011). Reciprocal Learning via Dialogue Interaction: Challenges and Prospects. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).7 indexed citations
4.
Cooper, Robin & Brian H. Maskell. (2008). How to Manage Through Worse-Before-Better. MIT Sloan management review. 49(4). 58–65.36 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Robin & Aarne Ranta. (2007). Natural Languages as Collections of Resources. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).6 indexed citations
Slagmulder, Regine & Robin Cooper. (2004). Cost analysis outside the organization. Journal of cost management. 18(3). 44–46.3 indexed citations
8.
Cooper, Robin. (2003). Interorganizational costing, part 2. Journal of cost management. 17(6). 12–24.10 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Robin & Regine Slagmulder. (2003). Strategic cost management: Expanding scope and boundaries. Journal of cost management. 17(1). 23–30.30 indexed citations
10.
Cooper, Robin. (2002). Target costing for new-product development. Journal of cost management. 16(3). 5–12.13 indexed citations
11.
Cooper, Robin & Regine Slagmulder. (2002). Target costing for new-product development: component-level target costing. Journal of cost management. 16(4). 36–40.10 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, Robin & Regine Slagmulder. (1999). Developing profitable new products with target costing. Tilburg University Research Portal.107 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, Robin & Regine Slagmulder. (1999). Strategic cost management - Activity-based cost management system architecture, Part II. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 69–70.1 indexed citations
14.
Cooper, Robin & Regine Slagmulder. (1999). Strategic cost management - Intelligent cost system design. Research portal (Tilburg University). 18–20.6 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Robin & Robert S. Kaplan. (1998). The promise--and peril--of integrated cost systems.. PubMed. 76(4). 109–19.104 indexed citations
16.
Cooper, Robin. (1990). Implementing an Activity-Based Cost System. Journal of cost management.53 indexed citations
17.
Cooper, Robin. (1989). The Rise of Activity-Based Costing-Part Four : What Do Activity-based Cost Systems Look Like?. Journal of cost management.58 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.