Bulletin de correspondance hellénique

1.6k papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique usually cover Archeology (1.0k papers), Anthropology (828 papers) and Classics (144 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (900 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (784 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (346 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique are Vassos Karageorghis, Georges Daux, Philippe Bruneau, Louis Robert, Yvon Garlan, Pierre Amandry, Jean-Yves Empereur, Olivier Masson, Denis Knoepfler and Jean Bousquet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique.

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin de correspondance hellénique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025