Journal for the History of Rhetoric

237 papers and 364 indexed citations i.

About

The 237 papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric in the last decades have received a total of 364 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric usually cover Philosophy (155 papers), Sociology and Political Science (63 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (46 papers) specifically the topics of Rhetoric and Communication Studies (130 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (26 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal for the History of Rhetoric are Debra Hawhee, Jason Edward Black, David Frank, Darrel Wanzer-Serrano, Jeffrey Walker, Jason Edwards, Ekaterina V. Haskins, Scott R. Stroud, András Bozóki and Richard Leo Enos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric.

Countries where authors publish in Journal for the History of Rhetoric

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for the History of Rhetoric with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for the History of Rhetoric more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025