Journal of Organization Design

245 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 245 papers published in Journal of Organization Design in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Organization Design usually cover Strategy and Management (130 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (50 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (49 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (101 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (49 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Organization Design are Rahul Kapoor, Jay R. Galbraith, Carliss Y. Baldwin, Phanish Puranam, Greg Linden, David J. Teece, Josef Windsperger, Thorsten Koch, Richard M. Burton and Børge Obel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Organization Design

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Organization Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Organization Design.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Organization Design

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Organization Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Organization Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Organization Design more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025