Local and Regional Anesthesia

223 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 223 papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia usually cover Surgery (185 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (62 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (58 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (154 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (66 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Local and Regional Anesthesia are Stefan De Hert, Ki Jinn Chin, Kariem El‐Boghdadly, Marc Snoeck, Amit Pawa, Jeff Gadsden, H. Jlala, Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni, Richard D. Urman and Stephen H. Halpern.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Local and Regional Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Local and Regional Anesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Local and Regional Anesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Local and Regional Anesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025