Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy

2.8k papers and 48.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 48.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy usually cover Oncology (1.3k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.1k papers) and Molecular Biology (685 papers) specifically the topics of Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (245 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (195 papers) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy are Richard Görlick, Herbert B. Newton, Eric A. Engels, Omar Abdel‐Rahman, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Devika Gajria, Alexander J. Chou, Susan E. Bates, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald and Antonio J Grillo-López.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025