Peter Bright

4.2k citations
57 papers · 2.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Bright

54 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Peter Bright
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 897
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 505
  • Social Psychology 618
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 459
Replace Melissa C. Duff with:
Melissa C. Duff United States
Katiuscia Sacco Italy
Juliana V. Baldo United States
Martina Piefke Germany
Sarah White United Kingdom
Vanessa Troiani United States
Jennifer Cook United Kingdom
Bart Boets Belgium
Elise Temple United States
Jarrad A. G. Lum Australia
Peter Bright relative to Melissa C. Duff United States Melissa C. Duff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Melissa C. Duff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bright. The network helps show where Peter Bright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bright Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997285
2 2002225
3 2004207
4 2005197
5 1999194
6 1996152
7 2006146
8 2004143
9 2008125
10 2004109
11 2003105
12 200088
13 201686
14 201880
15 200675
16 200359
17 200859
18 201555
19 201450
20 200550

About Peter Bright

Peter Bright is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Language Development and Disorders (7 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (897 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (505 citations), Social Psychology (618 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (459 citations). Peter Bright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine K. Tyler, Helen Moss, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Michael D. Kopelman, Dorothy Bishop, Eli J. Jaldow, Sonia J. Bishop, Ian van der Linde, Roberto Filippi and SA Abdallah. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Neuropsychologia, Cerebral Cortex, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact