Peter Bright

4.2k total citations
57 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Peter Bright is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Bright has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 15 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Peter Bright's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers). Peter Bright is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers). Peter Bright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Peter Bright's co-authors include Lorraine K. Tyler, Helen Moss, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Michael D. Kopelman, Dorothy Bishop, Eli J. Jaldow, Sonia J. Bishop, Ian van der Linde, Roberto Filippi and SA Abdallah and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Brain.

In The Last Decade

Peter Bright

54 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Bright United Kingdom 26 2.0k 897 618 505 459 57 2.9k
Jennifer Cook United Kingdom 27 1.6k 0.8× 662 0.7× 657 1.1× 271 0.5× 413 0.9× 95 3.0k
Jarrad A. G. Lum Australia 37 1.7k 0.9× 1.7k 1.9× 307 0.5× 351 0.7× 405 0.9× 111 3.5k
Martina Piefke Germany 21 1.3k 0.7× 358 0.4× 555 0.9× 424 0.8× 509 1.1× 52 2.2k
Juliana V. Baldo United States 33 2.9k 1.5× 952 1.1× 433 0.7× 669 1.3× 854 1.9× 63 4.2k
Katiuscia Sacco Italy 35 2.6k 1.3× 393 0.4× 372 0.6× 517 1.0× 712 1.6× 82 3.8k
David Pineda Colombia 27 1.2k 0.6× 510 0.6× 322 0.5× 425 0.8× 1.3k 2.9× 97 2.6k
Vanessa Troiani United States 21 2.7k 1.4× 737 0.8× 481 0.8× 357 0.7× 520 1.1× 62 3.3k
William G. Kronenberger United States 39 2.7k 1.4× 1.9k 2.1× 257 0.4× 589 1.2× 778 1.7× 152 4.7k
Marie Vandekerckhove Belgium 30 1.8k 0.9× 306 0.3× 740 1.2× 1.2k 2.3× 292 0.6× 82 3.1k
Gail Robinson Australia 26 1.2k 0.6× 425 0.5× 225 0.4× 245 0.5× 537 1.2× 141 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bright. The network helps show where Peter Bright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bright. Peter Bright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bright, Peter, et al.. (2025). Exceptional set estimates in finite fields. 50(2).
2.
Linde, Ian van der & Peter Bright. (2024). The prediction limits of the National Adult Reading Test and its abbreviated and international variants. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 30(9). 812–818. 1 indexed citations
3.
Butler, Laurie T., Sarah Morgan‐Trimmer, Peter Bright, et al.. (2024). Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family). Age and Ageing. 53(8). 1 indexed citations
5.
Filippi, Roberto, et al.. (2018). The Importance of Socioeconomic Status as a Modulator of the Bilingual Advantage in Cognitive Ability. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1818–1818. 41 indexed citations
6.
Bright, Peter, et al.. (2016). Involvement of Spearman's g in conceptualisation versus execution of complex tasks. Acta Psychologica. 170. 112–126. 2 indexed citations
7.
Filippi, Roberto, John Morris, Fiona M. Richardson, et al.. (2014). Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension. Bilingualism Language and Cognition. 18(3). 490–501. 50 indexed citations
8.
Filippi, Roberto, et al.. (2014). Possible effects of pramipexole on neck muscles in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Oxford Medical Case Reports. 2014(1). 8–10.
9.
Kopelman, Michael D., et al.. (2009). Remote semantic memory in patients with Korsakoff's syndrome and herpes encephalitis.. Neuropsychology. 23(2). 144–157. 13 indexed citations
10.
Duncan, John S., Alice Parr, Alexandra Woolgar, et al.. (2008). Goal neglect and Spearman's g: Competing parts of a complex task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 137(1). 131–148. 125 indexed citations
11.
Kopelman, Michael D., et al.. (2006). Recall and recognition memory in amnesia: Patients with hippocampal, medial temporal, temporal lobe or frontal pathology. Neuropsychologia. 45(6). 1232–1246. 35 indexed citations
12.
Noppeney, Uta, Lorraine K. Tyler, Helen Moss, et al.. (2006). Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia. Brain. 130(4). 1138–1147. 146 indexed citations
13.
Moss, Helen, SA Abdallah, Paul C. Fletcher, et al.. (2005). Selecting Among Competing Alternatives: Selection and Retrieval in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus. Cerebral Cortex. 15(11). 1723–1735. 197 indexed citations
14.
Reed, Laurence, Daniel Lasserson, Paul Marsden, et al.. (2005). Correlations of Regional Cerebral Metabolism With Memory Performance and Executive Function in Patients With Herpes Encephalitis or Frontal Lobe Lesions.. Neuropsychology. 19(5). 555–565. 21 indexed citations
15.
Moss, Helen, Jennifer M. Rodd, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Peter Bright, & Lorraine K. Tyler. (2004). Anteromedial Temporal Cortex Supports Fine-grained Differentiation among Objects. Cerebral Cortex. 15(5). 616–627. 109 indexed citations
16.
Bright, Peter, Helen Moss, & Lorraine K. Tyler. (2004). Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain and Language. 89(3). 417–432. 143 indexed citations
17.
Tyler, Lorraine K., Peter Bright, Elizabeth L. Dick, et al.. (2003). DO SEMANTIC CATEGORIES ACTIVATE DISTINCT CORTICAL REGIONS? EVIDENCE FOR A DISTRIBUTED NEURAL SEMANTIC SYSTEM. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 20(3-6). 541–559. 59 indexed citations
18.
Bright, Peter, Eli J. Jaldow, & Michael D. Kopelman. (2002). The National Adult Reading Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: A comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 8(6). 847–854. 225 indexed citations
19.
Bright, Peter & Michael D. Kopelman. (2001). Learning and memory: recent findings. Current Opinion in Neurology. 14(4). 449–455. 2 indexed citations
20.
Bishop, Dorothy, et al.. (1996). The measurement of hand preference: A validation study comparing three groups of right‐handers. British Journal of Psychology. 87(2). 269–285. 152 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026