Nutritional Neuroscience

1.7k papers and 34.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 34.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience usually cover Physiology (551 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (411 papers) and Molecular Biology (282 papers) specifically the topics of Diet and metabolism studies (264 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (181 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nutritional Neuroscience are Barbara Shukitt‐Hale, Andrew Smith, James A. Joseph, P.D. Whanger, Balachandran Bashyam, A. Venket Rao, David Benton, W. M. Shaw, Harald Murck and Ali Reza Khalatbary.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Nutritional Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nutritional Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nutritional Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutritional Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025